Some Economic Principles Applied to Community Networks
by Katherine Degelau
Community Connector Staff
Should community networks partner with commercial organizations?
Why are local newspapers not succeeding in getting into the community information
market? There are many aspects of community networks and the world
of community information systems where information economics theory could
be applied. This can help make some of the issues that come from
partnering clearer and could help you determine whether or not your community
network should partner with different types of organizations.
Niche Markets | Product space
| Information Value | Value of Other
Features | Brand Management and Reputation | Trust
| A Well Organized Web Site | Strategic
Partnerships
Niche Markets
This comes from some literature that deals with partitioning a product
of any sort into a set of features. A theory exists in the economics
literature that no two products with the exact same feature set can coexist
for very long in the marketplace. One will lose out because of something,
price competition is usually the reason. One product will eventually
have to sell at $0 -- something that will *not* cover costs and therefore
drive that company out of business. If the two products are not for
sale, the one that is easier to use or the one that has lower transactions
costs will be the one that will eventually be used the most. The
community networking example here is: What features do community networks
have that a commercial site providing local information does not?
What does a commercial site have that a community network does not?
Product space
The next issue that will arise from the niche market is whether or
not the differences in those products will be enough of a difference for
both to exist in the same market. If they are too close together
in product space (i.e. too many features are the same) there will not be
enough of a customer base for both products. The results will be
the same as in the above section. Ideally, two products exist separately
with a bit of overlap in the customer base -- those are the customers that
get fought over in advertising campaigns. A good non- community networking
example is political parties. The democrats have some issues and
the republicans have some issues that they rarely waver on (think abortions
if you're feeling like these two parties have become the same). The
things that they fight about during election years are designed to attract
the people who could go either way for some reason. The democrats
have the left of the political spectrum, the republicans have the right,
and they fight over the center. A community networking movement example
might be: Do local newspapers do something too similar to community networks?
Do community networks do something too similar to newspapers, and is that
why the local newspapers are slow to move online?
Information Value
What is the value of information? What is the value of those
separate features? One person is obviously going to value some bit
of content differently than another. One person may care about the score
of the Michigan basketball game that happened this afternoon, but it is
unlikely that a person in California will. On an aggregate level,
you can determine which features one group of people has the highest utility
for. It is one reason that web logs help determine what ones audience
wants to see. One community network cannot give everyone exactly
what they want, but we give enough of them what they do want, and don't
throw what they don't want in their faces to make them want to come back.
This way they value the information that we provide more than they would
otherwise. What content do the people who visit any community network
want? This should be different from community to community because each
community is different.
Value of Other Features
There are a couple of different ways to define information; one is
a piece of content like a basketball score. Another way is to define
it as a process. A recipe is one way to think about this. It's
a piece of information that allows one to have a non-information product
at the end of it. Think about the skills that any local community
network has from its workers. What can they do that the local newspaper
or other local content provider cannot? Do the people in the community
value that? If so, it's entirely possible that a community network
is needed.
Brand Management and Reputation
People don't like to think. It's a difficult thing to do and
a lot of time and energy goes into reducing the amount that people think.
One way to do that is to have a something that will easily identify ones
product so the consumer doesn't have to think about the quality and features
of a variety of products. Think back to living in your first apartment.
Did you know what type of dishwashing soap to use? Probably not.
So you bought one, maybe because it was what someone at home used, maybe
because someone you knew used it or maybe you just grabbed one at random
from the shelf. You tried it. Maybe you liked it. Maybe
you didn't. If you didn't, you probably tried others. By now,
though, you probably have a favorite and just use that one, knowing what
the quality and features of it are. You assume that there will be
no change in these things because the company is probably stable and hasn't
just been bought out by someone else. Any community network has a brand
name that is worth money. A brand name and a reputation is a quality
indicator. Losing control over content means that one’s brand name may
suffer.
Trust
This is related to brand management. If your product's quality
is not stable because you keep changing something, trying to make it better,
you won't get trust from your users/customers/patrons and they'll use something
else, despite the fact that your product or community network might still
be better. Any community network wants its customers to trust them
and is understandably leery of a possible content control change.
A Well Organized Web Site
Someone made the comment in the discussion that all a commercial site
had was the same content with slicker artwork. While this may be true,
it also hearkens back to the ideas of niche markets and product space.
If the same content exists in two places, but one place makes it easier
to find the content that you want, you'll go back to the site where it's
easier to find what you're looking for. A main principle in any electronic
commerce will emphasize the importance of the public being able to find
your product and retrieve information about it, or from your product.
If the costs in either time or money for using your site are too high,
then people will just go buy a newspaper instead of using your site for
getting their information.
Strategic Partnerships
During the recent discussion of many of these issues on the listserv Communet, it
was mentioned that one specific community network had profited most from
partnerships with technology companies, and not with other information providers.
It may be that community networks discover and disseminate local information
on the internet better than anyone else in the community. This indicates
that they should concentrate on what they are good at and partner organizations
that can complement their skills. Again, use the skills that you
have, these are your strengths. Partner with those whose skills you
need but do not possess. Some community networks have the technology
skills. They may need to partner with other organizations that have
the local information skills.
These are just a few of the economic principles that can be applied to the field of Community Networking.
Originated: 01/23/99 | Maintained:
si.cn@umich.edu
URL
http://www.si.umich.edu/Community/connections/
Top of page
|